Effects of sentiment and emotion of campaign pitch on crowdfunding performance: A cross-cultural comparison
Main Article Content
Article Sidebar
Abstract
This study examines the effects of two extreme sentiments (positive vs. negative) and eight types of emotion (anger, fear, anticipation, trust, surprise, sadness, joy, and disgust) implied by the wording of the campaign pitch on the outcomes of crowdfunding, and how these effects would vary according to cultural differences (Western vs. Eastern). We analyze a sample drawn from 17,289 crowdfunding projects on Kickstarter in the "design" and "technology" category to examine how feelings can affect the success, the number of backers, and pledged amounts for crowdfunding projects. We find three regularities by using propensity score match to map Western campaigns to Eastern ones. First, negative sentiment is adversely associated with the success probability but positively related to backer count in the Eastern culture subsample. Second, specific emotions have a larger impact on crowdfunding success among Western culture projects. Third, the statistical significance and direction of the concerning effects differ across the two cultures. Our findings stay robust when we add more controls in a stepwise way. Hence, the study contributes to the literature and provides suggestions for practitioners by exploring the role of derived feelings in the crowdfunding campaign pitch and the entrepreneurial pitch at the early financing stage.
How to Cite
Article Details
Sentiment analysis, emotion, Kickstarter, crowdfunding campaign, pitch, supporter, pledged amount
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Anglin, A.H., Short, J.C., Drover, W., Stevenson, R.M., McKenny, A.F., & Allison, T.H. (2018). The power of positivity? The influence of positive psychological capital language on crowdfunding performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(4), 470-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.03.003
Cho, M., & and Kim, G. (2017). A cross-cultural comparative analysis of crowdfunding projects in the United States and South Korea. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 312-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.013
Davis, B.C., Hmieleski, K.M., Webb, J.W., & Coombs, J.E. (2017). Funders' positive affective reactions to entrepreneurs' crowdfunding pitches: The influence of perceived product creativity and entrepreneurial passion. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.006
Dern, D.P. (2014). Crowdfunding for Hardware. IEEE Spectrum, 52(1), 22-23. Retrieved August 31, 2021, from spectrum.IEEE.org website: https://spectrum.ieee.org/how-to-crowdfund-your-hardware-startup#toggle-gdpr
Gafni, H., Marom, D., & Sade, O. (2019). Are the life and death of an early-stage venture indeed in the power of the tongue? Lessons from online crowdfunding pitches. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 13(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1293
Gerber, E.M, Hui, J.S., & Kuo, P.-Y. (2012). Crowdfunding: Why people are motivated to post and fund projects on crowdfunding platforms. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Design, Influence, and Social Technologies: Techniques, Impacts and Ethics 2011 (Vol. 2, pp. 10-13). Retrieved August 31, 2021, from researchgate.net website: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261359489_Crowdfunding_Why_People_are_Motivated_to_Post_and_Fund_Projects_on_Crowdfunding_Platforms
Kaminski, J.C., & Hopp, C. (2019). Predicting outcomes in crowdfunding campaigns with textual, visual, and linguistic signals. Small Business Economics, 55, 627-649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00218-w
Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M.A. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 545-564. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.188
Mendoza-Denton, R., Ayduk, O., Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Testa, A. (2001). Person × Situation interactionism in self-encoding (Iam...when...): Implications for affect regulation and social information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(4), 533-544. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.4.533
Mohammad, S.M., & Turney, P.D. (2010). Emotions evoked by common words and phrases: Using mechanical turk to create an emotion lexicon. Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text (pp. 26-34). Retrieved August 31, 2021, from dl.acm.org website: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1860631.1860635
Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005
Parhankangas, A., & Renko, M. (2017). Linguistic style and crowdfunding success among social and commercial entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(2), 215-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.11.001
Roundy, P.T., & Asllani, A. (2018). Understanding the language of entrepreneurship: An exploratory analysis of entrepreneurial discourse. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 35(2), 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-08-2017-0084
Ryu, S. (2019). Beauty of crowdfunding: Blooming creativity and innovation in the digital era. London, England: Routledge.
Ryu, S., & Kim, Y.-G. (2018). Money is not everything: A typology of crowdfunding project creators. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27(4), 350-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2018.10.004
Ryu, S., Park, J., Kim, K., & Kim, Y.-G. (2020). Reward versus altruistic motivations in reward-based crowdfunding. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 24(2), 159-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2020.1715531
S., Rotem, & Munim, Z. H. (2019). Reward crowdfunding contribution as planned behaviour: An extended framework. Journal of Business Research, 103, 56-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.013
Zheng, H., Xu, B., Zhang, M., & Wang, T. (2018). Sponsor's cocreation and psychological ownership in reward-based crowdfunding. Information Systems Journal, 28(6), 1213-1238. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12190