South Africa’s former apartheid government deeply entrenched racial and gender inequalities amongst South Africans and excluded both blacks and women from participating in the economy and the workplace. Since the advent of democracy in the country in 1994, regulations such as the Employment Equity Act of 1998 were introduced to include both women and blacks in the working environment. The purpose of this study is to empirically examine the impact of gender diversity on 21 State-Owned Companies (SOCs), from 2010 to 2014. Correlation and regression analysis were used to investigate the relationship between women who are executive managers and the companies’ financial performance (i.e. profit margin, return on assets and fruitless and wasteful expenditure as a percentage of revenue). The results indicate that there has been slow progress made by the South African government in recruiting women at the executive management level in SOCs. Furthermore, an insignificant relationship was found between women in executive positions and the financial performance of those SOCs. These findings are useful for South African regulators and policymakers as they justify efforts to employ women in the executive management teams in SOCs. The study adds to existing research in the private sector, demonstrating the financial benefits of gender diversity.
How to Cite
state-owned companies, executive managers, gender diversity, financial performance
Adams, R. B. & Ferreira, D. 2009. Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), pp. 291-309.
Ali, M., Kulik, C. T. & Metz, I. 2011. The gender diversity–performance relationship in services and manufacturing organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(07), pp. 1464-1485.
Baek, J. S., Kang, J. K. & Park, K. S. 2004. Corporate governance and firm value: Evidence from the Korean financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 71(2), pp. 265-313.
Bilimoria, D. & Wheeler, J. V. 2000. Women corporate directors: Current research and future directions. Women in Management: Current Research Issues, 2(10), pp. 138-163.
Bonn, I. 2004. Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Management & Organization, 10(1), pp. 14-24.
Burgess, Z. & Tharenou, P. 2002. Women Board Directors: Characteristics of the Few. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(1), pp. 39-49. DOI:10.1023/A:1014726001155
Burns, C. Barton, K. & Kirby, S. 2012. The state of diversity in today’s workforce. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
Burton, C. 1991. The Promise and the Price: The Struggle for Equal Opportunity in Women’s Employment. Australia: Allen & Unwin.
Carli, L. L. & Eagly, A. H. 2001. Gender, hierarchy and leadership: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), pp. 629-636.
Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J. & Simpson, W. G. 2003. Corporate Governance, Board Diversity and Firm Value. The Financial Review, 38, pp. 33-53. http://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6288.00034
Carver, J. and Oliver, C., 2002. Corporate boards that create value: Governing company performance from the boardroom. John Wiley & Sons.
Catalyst Knowledge Center. 2017a. Women in Management. Retrieved from: http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-management. [Date accessed: February 27 2018].
Catalyst Knowledge Center. 2017b. Women in S&P 500 Companies. Retrieved from: http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-sp-500-companies. [Date accessed: February 27 2018].
Daily, C.M., Certo, S.T. and Dalton, D.R., 1999.. A Decade of Corporate Women: Some Progress in the Boardroom, None in the Executive Suite. Strategic Management Journal, 20, pp. 93-99.
Dewan, S. 2013. Executive Director of the JustJobs Network, offered invaluable inputs throughout the research and writing process for this report. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/documents/publication/wcms_616213.pdf. [Date accessed: 15 February 2019 ].
Dezsö, C. L. & Ross, D. G. 2012. Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), pp. 1072-1089.
Kang, E., Ding, D.K. and Charoenwong, C., 2010. Investor reaction to women directors. Journal of Business Research, 63(8), pp.888-894.
Ernst & Young. 2015. Navigating disruption with gender diversity? Think again. Retrieved from: http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-women-in-industry/$FILE/EY-women-inindustry.pdf [Date accessed: 15 February 2019].
Fairfax, L.M., 2006. Clogs in the pipeline: The mixed data on women directors and continued barriers to their advancement. Md. L. Rev., 65, p.579.
Farrell, K.A. & Hersch, P.L. 2005. Additions to corporate boards: the effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1), pp. 85-106.
Fondas, N. & Sassalos, S. 2000. A different voice in the boardroom: How the presence of women directors affects board influence over management. Global Focus, 12(2), pp. 13-22.
Hambrick, D. C. & Mason, P. A. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), pp. 193-206.
Haniffa, R. & Hudaib, M. 2006. Corporate governance structure and performance of Malaysian listed companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(7?8), pp. 1034-1062.
Huse, M. & Solberg, G. A. 2006. Gender-related boardroom dynamics: How Scandinavian women make and can make contributions on corporate boards. Women in Management Review, 21(2), pp. 113-130.
Jonty, T. & Mokoteli, T. M. 2014. The impact of gender diversity in the boardroom on firm performance: A South African perspective. Corporate Boards: Role, Duties and Composition, 11(1), pp. 74-82.
Keasey, K., Thompson, S. and Wright, M. eds., 1997. Corporate governance: Economic and financial issues. OUP Oxford.
Lehobo, L. 2011. The relationship between gender diversity and corporate profitability: The top 100 companies on the JSE Ltd. (Doctoral dissertation). Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg.
Mannix, E. & Neale, M. A. 2005. What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(2), pp. 31-55.
McGregor, J. 2017. The number of women CEOs in the Fortune 500 is at an all-time high — of 32. The Washington Post. Retrieved from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/onleadership/wp/2017/06/07/the-number-of-women-CEOs-in-the-fortune-500-is-at-an-all-time high-of-32/?utm_term=.39112d648e98. [Date accessed: 1 February 2019].
McKinsey and Company (2008), Women Matter 2: Female Leadership, A Competitive Edge for the Future, McKinsey & Company, Paris
Pearce, J. A. & Zahra, S. A. 1991. The relative power of CEOs and boards of directors: Associations with corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), pp. 135-153.
Powell, G. N. & Graves, L. 2003. Men and women in management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Republic of South Africa (RSA). 1998. Employment Equity Act no 55, Government Notice 1323. Government Gazette, no. 19370, 19 October 2005.
Republic of South Africa (RSA). 1999. National Treasury. Available: http://www.treasury.gov.za/legislation/pfma/act.pdf. [Date accessed: 5 February 2016].
Republic of South Africa (RSA). 2013. Department of Labour. https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/14-cee-annual-repport_1.pdf. [Date accessed: 5 February 2016].
Rhode, D. L. & Packel, A. K. 2014. Diversity on corporate boards: How much difference does difference make? Del. J. Corp. L. 39, p. 377.
Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. W. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), pp. 737-783.
Singh, V. & Vinnicombe, S. 2004. Why so few women directors in top UK boardrooms? Evidence and theoretical explanations. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4), pp. 479-488.
Smith, N., Smith, V. & Verner, M. 2006. Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(7), pp. 569-593.
Statistics South Africa (StatsSA). 2011. Stats SA 2011 Annual Report. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.
Vafeas, N. & Theodorou, E. 1998. The relationship between board structure and firm performance in the UK. The British Accounting Review, 30(4), pp. 383-407.
Zahra, S. A. & Stanton, W. W. 1988. The implications of board of directors’ composition for corporate strategy and performance. International Journal of Management, 5(2), pp. 229-236.