The difficult act of balancing financial and academic performance: Product adaptation strategies at university branch campuses

  • Ali Bhayani University of Wollongong Dubai
Keywords: higher education, internationalization, product adaptation, branch campuses, academic standards

Abstract

Adapting a product to suit local requirements is a well-known international marketing strategy. Branch campuses generally adapt programs to suit local requirements. However, the academic fraternity has resisted adaptation on concerns about the dilution of academic standards. This study uses data from five branch campuses to examine the link between adaptation and financial and academic performance. The results indicate that adaption leads to increased financial performance but does not maintain academic standards. The study recommends strategies to maintain a balance between an ethnocentric approach, which calls for similar academic standards, and a geocentric approach, which requires adaptation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of management review, 36(2), 247-271. doi:10.5465/AMR.2011.59330882

Bamberger, P. A., & Pratt, M. G. (2010). Moving forward by looking back: reclaiming unconventional research contexts and samples in organizational scholarship. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 665-671. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.52814357

Bhayani, A. (2014). The market route to higher education in UAE: its rationales and implications. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 11(1), 75-87.

Bhayani, A. (2015). Building entrepreneurial universities in a specific culture—barriers and opportunities. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 20(4), 312-330.

Bolsmann, C., & Miller, H. (2008). International student recruitment to universities in England: Discourse, rationales, and globalisation. Globalisation, Societies, and Education, 6(1), 75-88.

Brouthers, L. E., O’Donnell, E., & Keig, D. L. (2013). Isomorphic pressures, peripheral product attributes and emerging market firm export performance. Management International Review, 53(5), 687-710.

Buchanan, D. A., & Bryman, A. (2007). Contextualizing methods choice in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 10(3), 483-501.

Carneiro, J., Farias, I., da Rocha, A., & Ferreira da Silva, J. (2016). How to measure export performance? Scholars’ vs. practitioners’ answers. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 410-417. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.046

Chapman, D., Austin, A., Farah, S., Wilson, E., & Ridge, N. (2014). Academic Staff in the UAE: Unsettled Journey. Higher Education Policy, 27(1), 131-151. doi:10.1057/hep.2013.19

Conti, J. A., & O’Neil, M. (2007). Studying power: Qualitative methods and the global elite. Qualitative Research, 7(1), 63-82.

Deem, R. (2001). Globalization, new managerialism, academic capitalism and entrepreneurialism in universities; is the local dimension still important? Comparative education, 37(1), 7-20.

Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80-88.

Diamantopoulos, A., & Kakkos, N. (2007). Managerial assessments of export performance: conceptual framework and empirical illustration. Journal of International Marketing, 15(3), 1-31.

Dow, D., & Karunaratna, A. (2006). Developing a multidimensional instrument to measure psychic distance stimuli. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(5), 578-602.

Fielden, J. (2017). Global: Financial Aspects of Offshore Activities Understanding Higher Education Internationalization (pp. 45-47): Springer.

Garner, R., & Scott, G. M. (2013). Doing qualitative research: designs, methods, and techniques: Pearson Education.

Garrett, R. (2018). International branch campuses: Success factors. International Higher Education, (93), 14-16.

Ghoshal, S. (1987). Global strategy: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal, 8(8), 425-440.

Gotsi, M., Lopez, C., & Andriopoulos, C. (2011). Building a country image through corporate image: exploring the factors that influence the image transfer. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 19(3), 255-272.

Green, M. F., Kinser, K., & Eckel, P. D. (2008). On the ground overseas: US degree programs and branch campuses abroad. American Council on Education.

Harvey, L. J., & Myers, M. D. (1995). Scholarship and practice: the contribution of ethnographic research methods to bridging the gap. Information Technology & People, 8(3), 13-27.

Healey, N. M. (2018). The Optimal Global Integration-Local Responsiveness Tradeoff for an International Branch Campus. Research in Higher Education, 59(5), 623-649. Doi:10.1007/s11162-017-9480-0

Helm, R., & Gritsch, S. (2014). Examining the influence of uncertainty on marketing mix strategy elements in emerging business to business export-markets. International Business Review, 23(2), 418-428.

Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Leavy, P. (2006). The Practice of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.

Hsuan-Fu, H., & Chia-Chi, H. (2008). Marketing mix formulation for higher education. The International Journal of Educational Management, 22(4), 328-340. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513540810875662

Jonathan, R. (1990). State Education Service or Prisoner's Dilemma: The ‘Hidden Hand’ as Source of Education Policy1. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 22(1), 16-24. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.1990.tb00421.x

Kerr, C. (1990). The Internationalization of Learning and the Nationalization of the Purposes of Higher Education: Two" Laws of Motion" in Conflict? European Journal of Education, 25(1), 5-22.

Kosmützky, A., & Putty, R. (2015). Transcending Borders and Traversing Boundaries. Journal of Studies in International Education, 20(1), 8-33. Doi:10.1177/1028315315604719

Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 215-233. Doi:10.2307/3069293

Kraus, S., Ambos, T. C., Eggers, F., & Cesinger, B. (2015). Distance and perceptions of risk in internationalization decisions. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1501-1505. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.041

Kravets, O., & Sandikci, O. (2014). Competently ordinary: New middle class consumers in the emerging markets. Journal of Marketing, 78(4), 125-140.

Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology: Sage.

Lages, L. F., Mata, J., & Griffith, D. A. (2013). Change in international market strategy as a reaction to performance decline. Journal of Business Research, 66(12), 2600-2611. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.05.018

Lee, C., & Griffith, D. A. (2004). The marketing strategy-performance relationship in an export-driven developing economy: A Korean illustration. International Marketing Review, 21(3), 321-334.

Lee, R. P. (2010). Extending the Environment-Strategy-Performance Framework: The roles of multinational corporation network strength, market responsiveness, and product innovation. Journal of International Marketing, 18(4), 58-73.

Leonidou, L. C., Katsikeas, C. S., & Samiee, S. (2002). Marketing strategy determinants of export performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 55(1), 51-67.

Lieven, M., & Martin, G. (2006). Higher Education in a Global Market: The Case of British Overseas Provision in Israel. Higher Education, 52(1), 41-68. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6374-9

Madsen, T. K. (1998). Managerial judgment of export performance, 6(3), Journal of International Marketing, 82-93.

Magnusson, P., Westjohn, S. A., Semenov, A. V., Randrianasolo, A. A., & Zdravkovic, S. (2013). The role of cultural intelligence in marketing adaptation and export performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 21(4), 44-61.

Marginson, S. (2013). The Lost Soul of Higher Education: Corporatization, the Assault on Academic Freedom, and the End of the American University [Book Review]. Labour History,105, 262-263.

Mayson, S., & Schapper, J. (2012). Constructing teaching and research relations from the top: An analysis of senior manager discourses on research-led teaching. Higher Education, 64(4), 473-487.

Michailova, S. (2011). Contextualizing in International Business research: Why do we need more of it and how can we be better at it? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27(1), 129-139. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2010.11.003

Naidoo, R., Sankar, A., & Ekant, V. (2011). The consumerist turn in higher education: Policy aspirations and outcomes. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(11-12), 1142-1162.

Nelson Oly Ndubisi, P., Naidoo, V., & Wu, T. (2014). Innovations in marketing of higher education: Foreign market entry mode of not-for-profit universities. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 29(6), 546-558.

Nixon, E., Scullion, R., & Hearn, R. (2016). Her majesty the student: marketised higher education and the narcissistic (dis)satisfactions of the student-consumer. Studies in Higher Education, 1-21. doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1196353

OBHE/C-BERT. (2016). International Branch Campuses: Trends and Developments: The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education/Cross-Border Education ….

Piekkari, R., Welch, C., & Paavilainen, E. (2008). The Case Study as a Disciplinary Convention. Organizational Research Methods, 12(3), 567-589. doi:10.1177/1094428108319905

Poulis, K., Poulis, E., & Plakoyiannaki, E. (2013). The role of context in case study selection: An international business perspective. International Business Review, 22(1), 304-314. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.04.003

Powers, T. L., & Loyka, J. J. (2010). Adaptation of marketing mix elements in international markets. Journal of Global Marketing, 23(1), 65-79.

Ragin, C. C. (1992). Introduction: Cases of what is a case? 1-17.

Redding, G. (2005). The thick description and comparison of societal systems of capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2), 123-155. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400129

Schilke, O., Reimann, M., & Thomas, J. S. (2009). When Does International Marketing Standardization Matter to Firm Performance? Journal of International Marketing, 17(4), 24-46. doi:10.1509/jimk.17.4.24

Shams, F., & Huisman, J. (2016). The role of institutional dual embeddedness in the strategic local adaptation of international branch campuses: evidence from Malaysia and Singapore. Studies in Higher Education, 41(6), 955-970. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.966669

Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analysing talk, text, and interaction (3rd ed. Ed.). London: SAGE.

Sminia, H. (2015). Contextualized explanation in strategy research, Research Methods for Strategic Management, (pp. 96-115), Routledge

Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 491-503.

Subramaniam, M., & Hewett, K. (2004). Balancing standardization and adaptation for product performance in international markets: testing the influence of headquarters-subsidiary contact and cooperation. MIR: Management International Review, 171-194.

Sugden, R. (2004). A Small Firm Approach to the Internationalisation of Universities: A Multinational Perspective. Higher Education Quarterly, 58(2-3), 114-135. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2273.2004.00264.x

Tan, Q., & Sousa, C. M. (2013). International marketing standardization. Management International Review, 53(5), 711-739.

Theodosiou, M., & Leonidou, L. C. (2003). Standardization versus adaptation of international marketing strategy: an integrative assessment of the empirical research. International Business Review, 12(2), 141-171. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(02)00094-X

Tikly*, L. (2004). Education and the new imperialism. Comparative Education, 40(2), 173-198.

Van Vught, F. (2008). Mission diversity and reputation in higher education. Higher Education Policy, 21(2), 151-174.

Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., & Lamprianou, I. (2009). International marketing adaptation versus standardisation of multinational companies. International Marketing Review, 26(4/5), 477-500. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02651330910971995

Wilkins, S., & Huisman, J. (2012). The international branch campus as a transnational strategy in higher education. Higher Education, 64(5), 627-645.

Yaprak, A., Xu, A. P. S., & Cavusgil, A. P. E. (2011). Effective global strategy implementation. Management International Review, 51(2), 179-192.

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods (3rd ed. ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif. ; London: SAGE.

Published
2019-12-08
How to Cite
Bhayani, A. (2019). The difficult act of balancing financial and academic performance: Product adaptation strategies at university branch campuses. Journal of Research in Emerging Markets, 1(4), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.30585/jrems.v1i4.341