Missing Link on Construct Validity in Qualitative Case Study
This paper aims to evaluate supporting references for the utilization of construct validity at the beginning of a qualitative case study. The term ‘construct validity' is used in quantitative study, but it has been claimed to be appropriate for use in qualitative case study as well. However, the quantitative research paradigm is inherently different from qualitative research. The research method in this paper uses descriptive analysis by literature study. It would be compared the consistency for each reference. Results may show that the supporting references for using construct validity in qualitative case study are not so strong. In fact, the revised supporting reference for construct validity has been changed in Yin case. This may be the first paper which criticizes the terminology of construct validity as it actually belongs to quantitative research method.
Andrade, A. D. (2009). interpretive research aiming at theory building: Adopting and adapting the case study design. The Qualitative Report 14 (1), pp. 42-60.
Anisimova, T. & Thomson, S.B. (2012). Using multimethod research methodologies for more informed decision making. JOAAG 7 (1), pp. 96-104.
Baskarada, S. (2014). Qualitative case study guidelines. The Qualitative Report 19, pp. 1-18.
Benijts, T., Lagae, W., & Vanclooster, B. (2011). The influence of sport leagues on the business-to-business marketing of teams: the case of professional road cycling. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 26 (8), pp. 602– 613.
Bradshaw T. D. (1999). Communities not fazed why military base closures may not be catastrophic. Journal of the American Planning Association 65 (2), pp. 193-206.
Campbell D. T., & Stanley J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally & Company
Coleman, M. E. (2008). Investigating the construct validity of office discipline referral as a measure of school-wide positive behavior support. Dissertation. Department of Educational Leadership and the Graduate School of the University of Orego.
Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct Validity in Psychological Tests. Psychological Bulletin 52 (4), pp. 281–302.
Cronbach, L.J., Gleser, G.C., Nanda, H., Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements. New York: Wiley.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act. Chicago: Aldine.
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks & London: Sage
Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), pp. 597-606.
Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W., & Wicki, B. 2008. What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Management Journal, 29 (13), pp. 1465-1474.
Gibbert, M. & Ruigrok, W. (2010). The “what” and “how” of case study rigor: Three strategies based on published work. Organizational Research Methods, 13 (4), pp. 710-737.
Guba,E.G. & Lincoln,Y.S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hipp, J. R. (2007). Block, tract, and levels of aggregation: Neighborhood structure and crime and disorder as a case in point. American Sociological Review 72 (5), pp. 658-680.
Hoyle. H. R, Harris J. M. and Judd M. C. (2002): Research Methods in Social Relations. Texas: Wadsworth.
Hussein, A. (2009). The use of triangulation in social sciences research: Can qualitative and quantitative methods be combined? Journal of Comparative Social Work 1: 1-12.
Judd, C. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1981) Estimating the Effects of Social Interventions. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
Judd, C. M, Smith, E. R. & Kidder, L. (1991) Research methods in social relations (6th ed.). Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Keating, W. D. & Krumholz, N. (1999). Rebuilding urban neighborhoods achievements, opportunities, and limits. California: Sage Publishing.
Kidder, L. 1981. Research methods in social relations (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Kidder, L., & Judd, C. M. (1986). Research methods in social relations (5th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Loseke, D. R. (2012). Methodological thinking: Basic principles of social research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Maruyama, G. & Ryan, C. S. (2014). Research methods in social relations. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Messick,, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.),. Educational Measurement (pp. 13-103). New York: American Council on Education/Macmillan.
Messick,, S. (1995). Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 14 (4): 5–8.
Silverman, D. (2005). Doing qualitative research. London: Sage.
Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data. London: Sage.
Stake, R. (1995). The art of case research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications
Tarba, S. & Weber, Y. (2011). Exploring integration approach in related mergers. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 19 (3): 202-221.
Wainer, H., & Braun, H. I. (1988). Test validity. Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence EarlbaumAssociates.
Yin, R.K (1984) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1st ed). California: Sage Publications.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2nd ed). California: Sage Publications.
Yin, R.K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed). California: Sage Publications.
Yin, R.K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed). California: Sage Publications.
Yin, R.K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ed). California: Sage Publications.
Yin, R.K. (2018). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (6th ed). California: Sage Publications.