Theorizing CSR Reporting: A Discursive Institutionalism Framework

  • Muatasim Ismaeel UniKL Business School, University of Kuala Lumpur
Keywords: CSR reporting, Sustainability reporting, Institutional Theory, Discursive Institutionalism, Institutional Logics


Although CSR reporting is a well-established business practice now, it is still an emerging genre that lacks convergence and standardization. Different theoretical perspectives are used to study CSR reporting. These perspectives agree on the instrumental nature of CSR reporting, while they vary in the aspects of the practice they emphasize and in their normative assumptions. Using ‘Discursive Institutionalism’ as a theoretical lens, different practices in the field can be incorporated in the proposed framework to reach a comprehensive understanding of CSR reporting phenomenon. The paper aims to propose a theoretical framework for CSR reporting research that enables a holistic and comprehensive explanation that is inclusive of different practices and normative assumptions in the field. The proposed framework utilizes new developments in Institutional Theory that emphasize multiple institutional logics, the hybridity of social practices, the role of social agents, and the discursive aspect of institutions. The proposed theoretical framework adds a new comprehensive perspective to CSR reporting research. It provides a solid theoretical base for further investigation of different practices in the field.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Muatasim Ismaeel, UniKL Business School, University of Kuala Lumpur

Correponding Author


Adams, C.A., 2008. A commentary on: corporate social responsibility reporting and reputation risk management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(3), pp.365-370.

Adams, C.A., 2004. The ethical, social and environmental reporting-performance portrayal gap. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,17(5), pp.731-757.

Adams, C.A., 2002. Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorising. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(2), pp.223-250.

Aiezza, M.C., 2015. “We may face the risks”…“risks that could adversely affect our face.” A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of modality markers in CSR reports. Studies in Communication Sciences, 15(1), pp.68-76.

Albers, C. and Günther, T., 2010. Disclose or not disclose: determinants of social reporting for STOXX Europe 600 firms. Zeitschrift für Planung & Unternehmenssteuerung, 21(3), pp.323-347.

Amran, A. and Siti-Nabiha, A.K., 2009. Corporate social reporting in Malaysia: a case of mimicking the West or succumbing to local pressure. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(3), pp.358-375.

Azizul Islam, M. and Deegan, C., 2008. Motivations for an organisation within a developing country to report social responsibility information: evidence from Bangladesh. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,21(6), pp.850-874.

Bebbington, J., Higgins, C. and Frame, B., 2009. Initiating sustainable development reporting: Evidence from New Zealand. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22(4), pp.588-625.

Bebbington, J., Larrinaga, C. and Moneva, J.M., 2008. Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(3), pp.337-361.

Belal, A.R., 2002. Stakeholder accountability or stakeholder management: a review of UK firms' social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting (SEAAR) practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(1), pp.8-25.

Bell, S., 2011. Do we really need a new ‘constructivist institutionalism’to explain institutional change?. British Journal of Political Science, 41(04), pp.883-906.

Bhatia, A., 2012. The Corporate Social Responsibility Report: The Hybridization of a “Confused” Genre (2007–2011). Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on, 55(3), pp.221-238.

Bhatia, V.K., 2010. Interdiscursivity in professional communication. Discourse & communication, 4(1), pp.32-50.

Boiral, O. and Henri, J.F., 2017. Is sustainability performance comparable? A study of GRI reports of mining organizations. Business & Society, p. 283-317

Bondy, K., 2008. Institutions and agency in CSR strategy: an empirical investigation of development and implementation (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham).

Boxenbaum, E., 2006. Corporate social responsibility as institutional hybrids. Journal of Business Strategies, 23(1), p.45.

Branco, M.C. and Rodrigues, L.L., 2008. Factors influencing social responsibility disclosure by Portuguese companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), pp.685-701.

Bremner, S., 2014. Genres and processes in the PR industry: Behind the scenes with an intern writer. International Journal of Business Communication, 51(3), pp.259-278.

Brown, J. and Fraser, M., 2006. Approaches and perspectives in social and environmental accounting: an overview of the conceptual landscape. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(2), pp.103-117.

Burchell, J. and Cook, J., 2006. Confronting the “corporate citizen” Shaping the discourse of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 26(3/4), pp.121-137.

Campbell, J.L., 2007. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of management Review, 32(3), pp.946-967.

Chen, S. and Bouvain, P., 2009. Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), pp.299-317.

Chen, J.C. and Roberts, R.W., 2010. Toward a more coherent understanding of the organization–society relationship: A theoretical consideration for social and environmental accounting research. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(4), pp.651-665.

Clemens, E.S. and Cook, J.M., 1999. Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change. Annual review of sociology, pp.441-466.

Contrafatto, M., 2014. The institutionalization of social and environmental reporting: An Italian narrative. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), pp.414-432.

de Villiers, C. and Alexander, D., 2014. The institutionalisation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The British Accounting Review, 46(2), pp.198-212.

Deegan, C., 2002. Introduction: the legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures-a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), pp.282-311.

Erickson, S.L., Weber, M. and Segovia, J., 2011. Using communication theory to analyze corporate reporting strategies. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 48(2), pp.207-223.

Erusalimsky, A., Gray, R. and Spence, C., 2006. Towards a more systematic study of standalone corporate social and environmental: An exploratory pilot study of UK reporting. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 26(1), pp.12-19.

Fairlough, N., 2010 (2nd ed.). Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. Harlow, UK: Longman.

Fifka, M.S., 2013. Corporate Responsibility Reporting and its Determinants in Comparative Perspective–a Review of the Empirical Literature and a Meta?analysis. Business strategy and the environment, 22(1), pp.1-35.

Geppert, M., Matten, D. and Walgenbach, P., 2006. Transnational institution building and the multinational corporation: An emerging field of research. Human Relations, 59(11), pp.1451-1465.

Gond, J.P. and Herrbach, O., 2006. Social reporting as an organisational learning tool? A theoretical framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 65(4), pp.359-371.

Gray, R., 2010. Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability… and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), pp.47-62.

Gray, R., 2006. Does sustainability reporting improve corporate behaviour?: Wrong question? Right time?. Accounting and Business Research, 36(sup1), pp.65-88.

Gray, R., Kouhy, R. and Lavers, S., 1995. Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), pp.47-77.

Green Jr, S.E. and Li, Y., 2011. Rhetorical institutionalism: Language, agency, and structure in institutional theory since Alvesson 1993. Journal of Management Studies, 48(7), pp.1662-1697.

Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E.R. and Lounsbury, M., 2011. Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), pp.317-371.

Guthrie, J. and Abeysekera, I., 2006. Content analysis of social, environmental reporting: what is new?. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 10(2), pp.114-126.

Hackston, D. and Milne, M.J., 1996. Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(1), pp.77-108.

Hartman, L.P., Rubin, R.S. and Dhanda, K.K., 2007. The communication of corporate social responsibility: United States and European Union multinational corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), pp.373-389.

Hooghiemstra, R., 2000. Corporate communication and impression management–new perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of business ethics, 27(1-2), pp.55-68.

Idowu, S.O. and Towler, B.A., 2004. A comparative study of the contents of corporate social responsibility reports of UK companies. Management of Environmental Quality: an international journal, 15(4), pp.420-437.

Jackson, G. and Apostolakou, A., 2010. Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: an institutional mirror or substitute?. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), pp.371-394.

Jamali, D., 2010. The CSR of MNC subsidiaries in developing countries: global, local, substantive or diluted?. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), pp.181-200.

Laine, M., 2009. Ensuring legitimacy through rhetorical changes? A longitudinal interpretation of the environmental disclosures of a leading Finnish chemical company. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,22(7), pp.1029-1054.

Levy, D.L., Brown, H.S. and De Jong, M., 2010. The Contested politics of corporate governance the case of the global reporting initiative. Business & Society, 49(1), pp.88-115.

Llewelyn, S., 2003. What counts as “theory” in qualitative management and accounting research? Introducing five levels of theorizing. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16(4), pp.662-708.

Manetti, Giacomo., 2011. "The quality of stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: empirical evidence and critical points." Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 18 (2): P. 110-122.

Marano, V., Tashman, P. and Kostova, T., 2017. Escaping the iron cage: Liabilities of origin and CSR reporting of emerging market multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(3), pp.386-408.

Mathews, M.R., 1997. Twenty-five years of social and environmental accounting research: is there a silver jubilee to celebrate?. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10(4), pp.481-531.

Momin, M.A. and Parker, L.D., 2013. Motivations for corporate social responsibility reporting by MNC subsidiaries in an emerging country: The case of Bangladesh. The British Accounting Review, 45(3), pp.215-228.

Morf, D., Flesher, D.L., Hayek, M., Pane, S. and Hayek, C., 2013. Shifts in corporate accountability reflected in socially responsible reporting: A historical review. Journal of Management History, 19(1), pp.87-113.

O'dwyer, B., 2002. Managerial perceptions of corporate social disclosure: An Irish story. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), pp.406-436.

Oliver, C., 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of management review, 16(1), pp.145-179.

Othman, R. and Ameer, R., 2010. Environmental disclosures of palm oil plantation companies in Malaysia: a tool for stakeholder engagement. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(1), pp.52-62.

Owen, D., 2008. Chronicles of wasted time?: A personal reflection on the current state of, and future prospects for, social and environmental accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21, pp.240-267.

Parker, L.D., 2005. Social and environmental accountability research: A view from the commentary box. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,18(6), pp.842-860.

Pedersen, E.R.G., Neergaard, P., Pedersen, J.T. and Gwozdz, W., 2013. Conformance and deviance: Company responses to institutional pressures for corporate social responsibility reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(6), pp.357-373.

Reynolds, M. and Yuthas, K., 2008. Moral discourse and corporate social responsibility reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1-2), pp.47-64.

Rutherford, B.A., 2013. A genre-theoretic approach to financial reporting research. The British Accounting Review, 45(4), pp.297-310.

Scherer, A.G., Palazzo, G. and Seidl, D., 2013. Managing legitimacy in complex and heterogeneous environments: Sustainable development in a globalized world. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), pp.259-284.

Schmidt, V.A., 2010. Taking ideas and discourse seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’. European political science review, 2(01), pp.1-25.

Spence, C., 2007. Social and environmental reporting and hegemonic discourse. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(6), pp.855-882.

Stanton, P. and Stanton, J., 2002. Corporate annual reports: research perspectives used. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(4), pp.478-500.

Tang, L., Gallagher, C.C. and Bie, B., 2015. Corporate social responsibility communication through corporate websites: A comparison of leading corporations in the United States and China. International Journal of Business Communication, 52(2), pp.205-227.

Tengblad, S. and Ohlsson, C., 2010. The framing of corporate social responsibility and the globalization of national business systems: A longitudinal case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(4), pp.653-669.

Williams, C.C., 2008. Toward a taxonomy of corporate reporting strategies. Journal of Business Communication, 45(3), pp.232-264