Notion of investment under the ICSID Arbitration: A jurisdictional dilemma between subjective and objective approaches

  • Nasiruddeen Muhammad University of Dubai - College of Law
Keywords: Investment, treaties, jurisdiction

Abstract

The notion of Investment is one of the most controversial issues trailing the dispute settlement mechanism of International Center for Settlement of Investment Dispute (ICSID). One notable issue surrounding the controversy is identifying an exact definition of investment for the purposes of ICSID Jurisdiction. While some tribunals tend to give effect to the agreement of the parties contained in their contracts or the underlying bilateral investment treaty as giving rise to the ICSID jurisdiction by consent, others tend to subject parties consent into a filtering mechanism based on a certain developed criteria. The aim of the paper is to add clarity to the corpus juris of investment treaty arbitration and provide guidance to the  investment treaty tribunals regarding the determination of notion of investment.  In doing so, the paper typifies the problem with the notable case of MHS v Malaysia. It then analyzes the two approaches from subjective and objective perspectives. The paper concludes with the proposition that ICSID notion of investment may not necessary lie with either of the two approaches.

Keyywords : Investment, treaties, jurisdiction

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ICSID Convention 1965

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties

Antonie Goeth and Others V Republic of Burundi, ICSID Case No. ARB/95/3, February 10, 1999, 15 ICSID Rev. 457 (2000)

Case concerning Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Guinea V Congo) ( Preliminary Objections), (ICJ General List No. 103, 24 May 2007)

Fedax v Venezuela, ICSID (Case No. ARB/96/3), Decision on Jurisidiction, July 11, 1997)

Jan de Nul N.V. Dredging International N.V. v Arab Republic of Egypt (ICSID Case No. ARB/04/13)

Joy Mining Machinery Limited v The Arab Republic of Egypt para ICSID, (Case No. ARB/03/11) August 6, 2005)

Lesi – Dipenta v Algeria ICSID (Case No. ARB/03/08) January 10, 2005

Malaysian Historical Salvors Sdn., Bhd. v. The Government of Malaysia, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/10, (Decision on the Application for Annullment), April 16, 2009

Malaysian Historical Salvors Sdn., Bhd. v. The Government of Malaysia, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/10, (Dissenting Opinion), February 19, 2009

Mihaly International Corporation v Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka (ICSID Case No. ARB/00/2)

Salini Costruttori S. P.A. V Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID (Case No. ARB/00/4) Decision on Jurisdiction, July 16, 2001

RREEF Infrastructure (G.P.) Limited and RREEF Pan-European Infrastructure Two Lux S.à r.l. v. Kingdom of Spain (ICSID Case No. ARB/13/30), Decision on Jurisdiction, 6 June 2016

C.H. Schreuer, The ICSID Convention: A Commentary (Cambridge University Press, 2001)

Dolzer R and Stevens M., Bilateral Investment Treaties., (Hague, Netherlands:Kluwer Law International, 1995)

Jeswald W Salacuse, The Law of Investment Treaties (2 edition, Oxford University Press 2015)

M Sornarajah, The International Law on Foreign Investment (4 edition, Cambridge University Press 2017)

Peter T. Muchlinski, The Rise and Fall of the Multilateral Agreement on Investment: Lessons for the Regulation of International Business, in Foundations And Perspectives of International Trade Law 114 (Ian Fletcher et al. eds., 2001)

Berk Demirkol, ‘The Notion of “Investment” in International Investment Law’ (Social Science Research Network 2015) SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2579247 accessed 20 October 2017
N. Rubins., The Notion of ‘Investment’ in International Investment Arbitration, in N. Horn (ed), Arbitrating Investment Disputes, (Netherlands, Kluwer Law International, (2004).

N.V.S.K. Nathan., ‘Submissions to the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes in Breach of the Convention’ (1995) 12 J Intl Arb p. 29.
Shihata I., Promotion of Foreign Direct Investment-A General Account, with particular reference to the Role of the World Bank Group, 6 ICSID Rev, FILJ 486- 488 (1991).

W. Ben Hamida, Two Nebulous ICSID Features: The Notion of Investment and the Scope of Annulment Control Ad Hoc Committees’s Decision in Patrick Mitchell V. Democratic Republic of Congo 24 (3) J Intl Arb, (2007).

Vandevelde K.J., A Brief History of International Investment Agreements, 12 U. C. Davis J. Int’l L. & Pol’y 157 2005-2006.

Odee S.J., Latin American Trade Negotiations with the United States, International Organization, Vol 34 No. 2 (Spring 1980), pp. 207-228 visited at http://www.jstor.org (last visited 15/10/17).

Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (vol. 8 P. 246)

Bilateral Investment Treaties 1995–2006: Trends In Investment Rulemaking United Nations New York and Geneva, 2007
http://www.unctad.org (last visited on 15/10/17).

untreaty.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf ( Last visited on 15/10/17).

OdeeS.J., Latin American Trade Negotiations with the United States, International Organization, Vol 34 No. 2 (Spring 1980), pp. 207-228 visited at http://www.jstor.org (last visited 15/10/17)

http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/IIA (last visited 15/10/17).
Published
2017-12-24